NIF's Ghost Makes Political Chaos in Sudan!

The political events in Sudan prove that the country needs a democratic secular government. There are two points to note here. The first point is that the allegedly classified as Islamic party follows in fact satanic agendas to work during democracy and dictatorship.

I do not know what to call this party. Having this party influenced by the Egyptian Muslim Brothers during the fiftieth, the party appeared as a Sudanese Muslim Brothers party. Then the party changed that name during the democratic periods in Sudan to be the Islamic Convention Party, then the National Islamic Front, then the National Conference party (NC) when the party carried the recent military coup to power, and then played a political game as opponent to the NC party and appeared as the Popular Congress Party.

The party aims definitely to make a chaos in the country, perplex the public opinion, and keep the leaders of the party present in any political changes in Sudan.

More at: http://www.hoa-politicalscene.com/hoa-political-scene-blog.html

Orebro at Night

Orebro at Night from Svampen. Series of videos from www.ezine-act-politics-business-and-love.com

Dansk Racisme er topstyret

Stay Secular Enhedslisten

Is there anything wrong with Enhedslistens political vision?

The leftist Danish party is facing political threats that may destroy the party's credibility and transparency. Of course, there should not be any discrimination between some beliefs. However, it is not healthy for a secular party to mix up politics with religion.

More in Danish at Nice Kids Fun

Islamophobia and Islamofascism

These are two bad words to describe, define and classify something goes with terrorism today.

Some people came with the term Islamofascism and some groups have been organized to take this term into actions. Lot of discussions are running defending this term and/or antagonizing it.

I think discussions in such matter are going to increase extremists from both sides.

If we get back to rationality, Islam has nothing to do with all these acts of violence in the world. Unfortunately, some people with economic power and interests have succeeded to blind some followers by such Islamic allegations to make wars here and there. So, that is not the mistake of the Islam. If we look back in history to the Christian wars, should we blame Jesus for that?!

More http://www.hoa-politicalscene.com/hoa-political-scene-blog.html

The State is a Secular Political Concept

Religions have nothing to do with the state!

The Cartoons have nothing to do with freedom of speech. Those prophets are making a wide range of followers worldwide and they should be respected. We need to be more tolerant and rationale when we deal with religions because violence is not a habit in religions unless people mistakenly interpret some verses according to their limited images.

The nature of any religion is love, freedom and peace; not hatred or war.

These acts we're seeing today from those who call themselves Muslims are not acceptable and have no sense. All people know that the religion will not be acceptable if it builds on hatred, so how could such Muslims if they're really Muslims do this? We should remember here also the reign of the Christian wars. Should we blame the Bible or Jesus?

In the other hand who makes terrorism escalating?

Religion in my vision has nothing to do with politics. There should be a clear division between religions and politics. If anyone wants to practise a religion she/he should go to where religions should be practised and that’s to be said will be in a church, a mosque or a temple.

This post was originally generated in response to a post on wordpress.com against Islam which I think is nonsense too.

http://www.hoa-politicalscene.com/hoa-political-scene-blog.html

Dictators of Sudan and Seculars

Numeri, the second military dictator in Sudan's history, was crazy that time he used the religion to implement what's so called the Sharia laws to deal with crimes he created in the state, in stead of the civil law of Sudan.

Numeri himself was not a religious man. He was a rebellious military man. His comrades know him as drunkard, womanizer and gambler. He has never been that "Sheikh". So, what had happened to change all those behaviours? And were they really changed?

Nothing has changed on those behaviours, although Numeri has succeeded to throw "aches on the eyes". But Numeri has changed to this criterion when he has been influenced by another false "Sheikh" called Hassan Abed-Allah El-Turabi who was then the leader of the "Muslim Brothers" party.

Coming back soon to continue those lines from my book –
Meanwhile read more at http://www.hoa-politicalscene.com/hoa-political-scene-blog.html